bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory1.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '23 at 02:54
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3615QM
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Memory 28.6
1-Core 61.7
2-Core 132
38% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 208
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Parallels Virtual NVMe Disk 275GB
234GB free (System drive)
Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 54 23 58 69 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 905
Write 612
Mixed 761
SusWrite 86.2
132% 591 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 12.7
34% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 175
136% 187 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 308%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.5
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 10.1
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 263
15% 263 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 5 60 0" 1440 900
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback