Pcware IPMH510G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemPcware IPMH510G  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE IPMH510G
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '23 at 22:49
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 121
2-Core 210
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 553
58% 464 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1273
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
5.41% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 7
5% 5.9 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 6
Splatting 10
6% 7.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.41%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03190003
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 28,980
Mixed 58.9
3,007% 14,519 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 16.9
4K Mixed 2.4
15% 7 MB/s
DQ Read 11.1
DQ Write 60.9
DQ Mixed 69.5
44% 47.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Generic Externa 250GB
183GB free
Firmware: 0056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 50 49 52 54 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 58.4
Write 46.7
Mixed 39.1
SusWrite 50.8
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MACROVIP 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
35.7% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 40" 1280 720 SNY2C02 SONY TV
Typical IPMH510G Builds (Compare 212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Pcware IPMH510G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $123
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback