MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230707
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 02 '23 at 20:27
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G-$35
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 89
2-Core 168
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 244
31% 237 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 14.7
12% 13 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 17.1
Splatting 15.5
11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 5.6 84 70 10 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
69% Good
Read 481
Write 392
Mixed 357
SusWrite 91.1
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 22.8
115% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 33.8
82% 165 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
556GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 148 147 151 151 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 153
Write 153
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 149
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.8
244% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
165GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 169 166 171 174 175 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 119 117 116 117 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 83.2
Write 130
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 118
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
97% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 90%
ST12000V N0007-2GS116 12TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 83 84 86 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 163
Write 151
Mixed 155
SusWrite 85.5
185% 139 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.5
290% 8.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 88%
ST8000DM 004-2U9188 8TB
847GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 87 83 83 87 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 126
Write 164
Mixed 137
SusWrite 85.5
176% 128 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
69% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 63%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.6 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 51.5
Write 21.6
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 4.4
30% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14%
Great: 61%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
931GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 34 34 35 35 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 56.6
Write 29.9
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 33.8
50% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
76% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 20%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
508GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 83 84 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 134
Write 159
Mixed 125
SusWrite 85.7
171% 126 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.7
206% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 70%
ST8000DM 004-2U9188 8TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 87 83 83 87 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 102
Write 124
Mixed 114
SusWrite 85.6
147% 106 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
40.9% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 13.8
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 7 60 27" 1280 720 AUS278F VG279QM
Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 2,997 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $297
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback