Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970A-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime17 Days
Run DateSep 02 '23 at 09:29
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 50%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 86
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 125
58% 93 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 319
34% 273 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.3% Above average
Lighting 63.2
Reflection 62.1
Parallax 94.9
52% 73.4 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 45.8
48% 60.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 644 575 567 589 587 589 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,197
Write 946
Mixed 955
SusWrite 592
207% 923 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 50
168% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 482
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 435
320% 422 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 155%
Great: 296%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
33GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 309 306 310 311 309 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 428
Mixed 383
SusWrite 311
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 42.4
142% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 259
196% 262 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$23
96GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 90 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 163
Write 159
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 90.3
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 109%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
490GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 109 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 101
Write 94.4
Mixed 97.6
SusWrite 110
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 76%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB
294GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 52.4
Write 26.6
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 24.9
40% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
57% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 56%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
146GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 106 109 102 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 106
134% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 49%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
402GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.5 3.6 3.3 3.2 3.2 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 51.5
Write 28
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 3.5
31% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
69% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.1% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 16.4
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 12
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 23" 1920 1080 HPN335E HP E230t
Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $269
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback