Clevo P370EM

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Clevo P370EM (all builds)
Motherboard	CLEVO P370EM
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121116
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '23 at 07:21
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 78.6 1-Core 82.7 2-Core 147 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 391 42% 331 Pts	64-Core 413 26% 413 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7970M 939 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Clevo(1558 0371) 2GB Driver: 22.6.1 Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Lighting 24.8 Reflection 30.7 Parallax 36.2 20% 30.6 fps	MRender 26.3 Gravity 26.7 Splatting 21 20% 24.7 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 24%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 480GB 279 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 406GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0414A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 376 348 416 409 416 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 422 Mixed 395 SusWrite 392 96% 426 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 72.8 4K Mixed 27.1 123% 44.2 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 45.7 96% 192 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Mac SODIM DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB 195 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	49% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 15.5 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 15.4 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 83.2 48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	17.3"	1920 1080	CMO1720

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P370EM Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

System: Clevo P370EM

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	10x
Core i7-3840QMIntel $549Bench 66%, 3,981 samples	9x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 680MNvidiaBench 19%, 1,365 samples	11x
GTX 670MXNvidiaBench 12%, 2,325 samples	7x
GTX 670MNvidiaBench 10%, 2,951 samples	4x

SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	7x
840 Pro 512GBSamsung $129Bench 96%, 14,996 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 4x4GBKingstonBench 64%, 15 samples	3x
Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,121 samples	3x
Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 54%, 160 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $515

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16