User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-8M-F
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '23 at 05:41
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 169
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 551
50% 422 Pts
64-Core 824
51% 824 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Star PCIe 3.0 SSD 512GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103E0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,537
Write 1,444
Mixed 1,005
296% 1,329 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 23.9
132% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 425
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 352
268% 365 MB/s
Liteon CV6-CQ256 256GB
70GB free
Firmware: 302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 172 172 172 173 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 414
Write 421
Mixed 373
SusWrite 189
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 36.7
118% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 179
178% 286 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HTH5AN8G8NCJR-VKD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.6% Above average
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 17.8
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 0 0" 1280 720
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback