MSI MS-16GD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star CX61 2QC
MotherboardMSI MS-16GD  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150909
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 01 '23 at 21:27
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4712MQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 78.4
2-Core 142
60% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 378
39% 313 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 10E9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 6
Parallax 5.8
3% 5.1 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ssd 512GB
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 303
Write 106
Mixed 111
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 11.3
62% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 70.3
DQ Mixed 70.3
75% 130 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 96%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a00a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 97.6
Write 103
Mixed 36.4
96% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB
23GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 130
Write 21.6
Mixed 61.7
73% 71 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 2.3
123% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.6% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 15.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 15.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 46 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD0465
Typical MS-16GD Builds (Compare 354 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 13% - Very poor Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback