Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI APEX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 233%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 281%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics233% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive354% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG RAMPAGE VI APEX  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200207
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateSep 01 '23 at 16:09
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10940X
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 285
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 600
8-Core 1,200
106% 900 Pts
64-Core 2,760
171% 2,760 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 102%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$835
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 5075 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Lighting 354
Reflection 315
Parallax 348
288% 339 fps
MRender 367
Gravity 282
Splatting 197
221% 282 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 233%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1765 1635 1510 1445 1420 1255 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
354% Outstanding
Read 2,622
Write 2,220
Mixed 1,850
SusWrite 1505
459% 2,049 MB/s
4K Read 70.9
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 101
336% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,303
DQ Write 1,086
DQ Mixed 1,180
888% 1,190 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 354%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
1GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,693
Write 2,637
Mixed 2,479
582% 2,603 MB/s
4K Read 82.3
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 111
382% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,404
DQ Write 1,190
DQ Mixed 1,269
958% 1,288 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$255
527GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 494 495 494 494 494 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 496
Mixed 450
SusWrite 494
110% 490 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 71.2
239% 85 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 142%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
161GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 141 140 140 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 83.5
Write 84.6
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 140
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 96%
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 16GB-$29
15GB free, PID 1a09
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 16 19 24 35 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 130
Write 46.4
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 24.8
62% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
142% Outstanding
MC Read 53.3
MC Write 72.2
MC Mixed 46.8
164% 57.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 13.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 142%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 160 34.1" 1280 720 GSM774B 34GN850
Typical ROG RAMPAGE VI APEX Builds (Compare 308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI APEX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,071
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback