Asus P8Z68-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '23 at 13:12
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 177
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 329
42% 320 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 838B) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 25.9
Parallax 17.5
15% 20.6 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 17.9
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
804GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 70 73 72 72 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 387
Write 358
Mixed 290
SusWrite 70.4
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 36.4
123% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 38.7
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 54.5
47% 67.3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 128%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
845GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 73 72 72 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 92.2
Write 73.4
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 72.2
56% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
879GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 82 80 80 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 87.6
Mixed 86.4
SusWrite 80.1
66% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 67%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 119 119 118 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 123
Write 112
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 118
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 133 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 127
Write 132
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 132
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 ACR0313 S275HL
Typical P8Z68-V Builds (Compare 827 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $795
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback