Viglen VIG440J

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemViglen VIG440J  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-B2
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '23 at 04:43
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 108
2-Core 204
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 657
65% 529 Pts
64-Core 782
48% 782 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 2300 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Lighting 93.8
Reflection 134
Parallax 90.8
76% 106 fps
MRender 75.2
Gravity 85.2
Splatting 77.8
65% 79.4 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N191129a
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 471
Write 63.4
Mixed 221
54% 252 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 38.6
143% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 137
108% 146 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 101%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
88GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 103
Write 100
Mixed 66.3
67% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 85%
APACER Portable HDD 2TB
1.5TB free, PID c004
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 14
Write 19.3
Mixed 18.4
23% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
159% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
57.4% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 19.1
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 12.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 100 27" 2560 1080 WAM3000 UG30
Typical VIG440J Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Viglen VIG440J

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $477
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback