Lenovo 81W4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81W4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime20 Days
Run DateAug 31 '23 at 21:46
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 254
71% 135 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 527
67% 507 Pts
64-Core 529
33% 529 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 381C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.28.10
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.37% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 20.1
5% 13.5 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 16.9
12% 13.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.37%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ128HBHQ-000L2 128GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 148 119 126 119 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 608
Write 152
Mixed 187
SusWrite 130
59% 269 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 25.4
93% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 193
159% 230 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 169%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
604GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 105 101 104 103 103 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 4471A5244CB0-CWE 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
72.5% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 25
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 20.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 21 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15E6
Typical 81W4 Builds (Compare 208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81W4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback