MSI MS-1782

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star GT72 6QD
MotherboardMSI MS-1782  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '23 at 20:30
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 103
2-Core 203
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 524
55% 439 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
MSI(1462 1156) 3GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.5% Below average
Lighting 36.9
Reflection 43
Parallax 38.3
30% 39.4 fps
MRender 40.3
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 34.4
31% 38.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme ADATA SX8100NP 512GB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1D57 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 685 470 893 835 858 482 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 2,319
Write 1,084
Mixed 1,304
SusWrite 704
299% 1,352 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 51.4
172% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 686
DQ Write 584
DQ Mixed 627
472% 632 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 217%
Great: 306%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
72.5% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 22.8
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 21.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 17.3" 1280 720 LGD0469
Typical MS-1782 Builds (Compare 540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-1782

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback