bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
Motherboard DH61BR
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '23 at 15:21
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
LGA1155 CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 73.6
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 156
58% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 240
32% 239 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Sapphire(174B E101) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
5.09% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 7
Parallax 5.9
5% 6.47 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 6
5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.09%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 175
Write 109
Mixed 5.2
21% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 15.3
39% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 13.7
DQ Write 30.4
DQ Mixed 21.3
16% 21.8 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 53%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
362GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 72 72 70 73 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 72.4
Write 71.7
Mixed 56
SusWrite 72.7
50% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-038.A00G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
24.3% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 51 60 23" 1280 720 AOC2351 2351
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback