Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '23 at 14:41
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$97
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 113
2-Core 222
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 643
66% 535 Pts
64-Core 783
48% 783 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$255
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 129
Parallax 126
114% 132 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 99.3
Splatting 96
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,975
Write 1,913
Mixed 1,615
409% 1,834 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 61.4
205% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 962
DQ Write 639
DQ Mixed 867
629% 823 MB/s
Poor: 184% Great: 288%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75
26GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 478
Write 452
Mixed 408
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 48.2
166% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 366
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Marvell Raid VD 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 148 150 149 150 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 152
Write 132
Mixed 110
SusWrite 149
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 113%
Marvell Raid VD 3TB
399GB free
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 113 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 125
Write 118
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 111
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3600 C17 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 31.9
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 27.2
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 52: 0P 5R 6G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
52% 34% 59 543 449 60 27" 1920 1080 ACR09B1 KA272
History: Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B | Score 52: 0P 5R 6G 9B
Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $475
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback