MSI MS-16J6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GL62 6QD
MotherboardMSI MS-16J6  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180117
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 31 '23 at 13:50
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Memory 22.7
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 153
44% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 269
33% 250 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
MSI(1462 1190) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3713
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.9
Reflection 24
Parallax 18
17% 21 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 15.6
14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 978 450 450 417 341 236 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 724
Write 919
Mixed 795
SusWrite 479
165% 729 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 30.9
98% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 553
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 422
317% 429 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 108%
Great: 262%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI21D4S15HAG/8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 302
13% 302 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 1R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 13% 47 174 58 60 15.5" 1536 864 CMN15D2
Typical MS-16J6 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback