Today's hottest deals

Zoostorm zoostorm

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemZoostorm zoostorm  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H81M-DS2V
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '23 at 11:45
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 160
73% 119 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 476
50% 400 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (65 fps cap detected)
52.3% Above average
Lighting 64.5
Reflection 65.8
Parallax 61
53% 63.8 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 65
Splatting 59.9
52% 63.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 392 421 418 432 440 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 334
Write 392
Mixed 345
SusWrite 416
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 45.6
143% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 159
148% 227 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 192 196 196 198 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 150
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 195
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 18.1
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 30 84.6" 1296 759 HEC002F HISENSE
Typical zoostorm Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Zoostorm zoostorm

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback