Metabox Alpha-X NH58HP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemMetabox Alpha-X NH58HP  (all builds)
MotherboardIT NH5x_NH7xHP
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210802
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateAug 31 '23 at 11:39
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 74.6
1-Core 148
2-Core 292
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 779
81% 650 Pts
64-Core 1,004
62% 1,004 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 50E2) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3713
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.5% Excellent
Lighting 127
Reflection 125
Parallax 36.7
103% 96.3 fps
MRender 44.3
Gravity 64.1
Splatting 80.8
54% 63.1 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Metabox Performance 1TB PCIe NVME SSD
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM53.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1485 626 168 155 144 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,249
Write 1,841
Mixed 1,296
SusWrite 456
273% 1,211 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 76.5
281% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 671
DQ Write 1,017
DQ Mixed 863
648% 851 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 202%
Great: 308%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FRS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 26.9
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 35.4
SC Mixed 17.5
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 24.5" 1920 1080 AUS25A8 VG259QM
Typical Alpha-X NH58HP Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

System: Metabox Alpha-X NH58HP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback