Supermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago.

System	Supermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DRH-7F
Memory	55.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	5120 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180713
Uptime	5.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 31 '23 at 09:34
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 1,235 User benchmarks, average bench 60% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	54% Above average	Memory 77.4 1-Core 45.7 2-Core 93.6 47% 72.2 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 357 30% 262 Pts	64-Core 551 34% 551 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% EVGA(3842 2774) 2GB CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.30 Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.2% Below average	Lighting 38.7 Reflection 23.2 Parallax 50.4 32% 37.4 fps	MRender 52.3 Gravity 46.2 Splatting 38.2 36% 45.6 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 557GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 72 71 74 74 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.4% Below average	Read 237 Write 75 Mixed 99.5 SusWrite 71.9 27% 121 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 33.3 4K Mixed 13.9 54% 19.9 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 72.9 DQ Mixed 84.1 70% 102 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 128%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165 41,734 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 54GB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 166 160 160 159 398 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Read 448 Write 155 Mixed 171 SusWrite 242 56% 254 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 49.1 4K Mixed 22.7 80% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 205 156% 210 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 128%
WD My Book 1130 2TB 1,666 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 38GB free, PID 1130 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 27 26 28 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 54.1 Write 26.4 Mixed 24.9 SusWrite 25.9 40% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 44% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0- 8x16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 8 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	75% Very good	MC Read 34 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 28.8 86% 30.3 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 5.6 20% 6.97 GB/s	Latency 85.4 47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	56	41	60	39.7"	1280 720	HPN3742 HP Z40c G3

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v21stBench 74%, 880 samples	6x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v21stBench 68%, 827 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	3x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	2x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	2x

SSD
830 256GBSamsung $261Bench 72%, 25,763 samples	2x
860 QVO 1TBSamsung $109Bench 89%, 201,200 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	1x

RAM
M393B1K70CH0- M393B1K70CH0- M393B1K70CH0- M393B1K70CH0- M393B1K70CH0- M393B1K70CH0- M393B1K70CH0- M393B1K70CH0-C M393B1K70CH0- M393B1K70CH0- M393B1K7... 128GBSamsungBench 74%, 4 samples	2x
HMT31GR7CFR4C 8x8GBHynixBench 90%, 41 samples	2x
F3 DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 57%, 254 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 5% - Terrible

Total price: $261

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16