Gigabyte GA-Z97N-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97N-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '23 at 04:44
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 96.3
1-Core 120
2-Core 223
85% 147 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 571
60% 480 Pts
64-Core 599
37% 599 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 213
Parallax 149
116% 168 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 175
Splatting 120
114% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGS31-500GS-2 500GB
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 398 298 285 279 328 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 290
Mixed 362
SusWrite 330
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 38.3
133% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 109%
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TB
92GB free
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 408 419 410 401 416 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 455
Mixed 354
SusWrite 410
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 39.5
133% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 102%
Great: 115%
Samsung 970 EVO 500G 500GB
71GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 351 354 365 365 363 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 340
Write 362
Mixed 283
SusWrite 352
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 29.7
95% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 184
128% 159 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 25.3
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 24.2
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 52.8
76% 52.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 21.5" 1920 1080 PLN2200 PLN2200
Typical GA-Z97N-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97N-Gaming 5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $576
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback