HP Desktop 460-p274

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Desktop 460-p274  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F2
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '23 at 00:36
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 105
2-Core 167
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 518
53% 430 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1400 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.8.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.3% Above average
Lighting 63.8
Reflection 63.6
Parallax 96.4
52% 74.6 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 77.6
Splatting 48
50% 62.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 302 213 48 76 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 458
Write 395
Mixed 367
SusWrite 184
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 34.1
125% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 213
186% 277 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 059B CT8G4DFRA266.C8FE 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.5% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 22.3
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 20.1
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 7 75 23.8" 1920 1080 GSM5C1A LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical Desktop 460-p274 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop 460-p274

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback