Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH570
Memory50.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210806
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 30 '23 at 21:32
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 57.2
1-Core 154
2-Core 303
88% 171 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 952
92% 754 Pts
64-Core 1,284
79% 1,284 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 2018) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.17% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 130
Parallax 10.9
8% 50.1 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 9.9
9% 11.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.17%
Great: 9%
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 2018) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 156
Parallax 137
118% 146 fps
MRender 157
Gravity 107
Splatting 106
99% 124 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 109%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
316GB free
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2963 2971 768 207 260 298 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 3,386
Write 3,367
Mixed 2,420
SusWrite 1,244
583% 2,604 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 74.7
282% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,069
DQ Write 794
DQ Mixed 962
711% 942 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 339%
Great: 633%
Nvme CA6-8D1024 1TB
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERA0901 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 807 564 751 688 606 528 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 2,128
Write 3,302
Mixed 1,237
SusWrite 657
412% 1,831 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 74.6
274% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1059
DQ Write 638
DQ Mixed 836
626% 844 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 247%
Great: 427%
WD Game Drive 5TB
3TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 100 100 101 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 116
Write 99
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 100
128% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
164% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY Inc M4S32S682LJJJ43-12 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
69.8% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 24.8
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 14.3
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 59 60 34" 1280 720 SAM0F70 S34J55x
Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409 Builds (Compare 1,445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback