Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 APEX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics398% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive537% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 APEX  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '23 at 18:04
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900KS-$590
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Memory 94
94% 94 Pts
Poor: 123% Great: 138%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5500 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
398% Outstanding
Lighting 654
Reflection 553
Parallax 752
533% 653 fps
MRender 490
Gravity 569
Splatting 291
353% 450 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 398%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4764 4485 5190 4625 757 790 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
537% Outstanding
Read 2,969
Write 4,706
Mixed 3,280
SusWrite 3,435
816% 3,597 MB/s
4K Read 70.8
4K Write 310
4K Mixed 128
434% 169 MB/s
DQ Read 1,907
DQ Write 1,400
DQ Mixed 1,468
1,148% 1,592 MB/s
Poor: 277%
This bench: 537%
Great: 604%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2X7200C34 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
215% Outstanding
MC Read 86.1
MC Write 86.9
MC Mixed 81.2
242% 84.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 57
SC Mixed 37
115% 40.2 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 146%
This bench: 215%
Great: 253%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical ROG MAXIMUS Z690 APEX Builds (Compare 529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 APEX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $1,015
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback