Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 169%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics172% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X12DPL-i6
Memory59.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '23 at 15:42
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4314
CPU1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 57.7
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 165
57% 102 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 665
57% 491 Pts
64-Core 3,547
220% 3,547 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
PNY(196E 1385) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
172% Outstanding
Lighting 228
Reflection 282
Parallax 306
186% 272 fps
MRender 330
Gravity 241
Splatting 181
197% 251 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 172%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZILT960HBHQ/007 960GB
854GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 902 803 787 786 712 722 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 245 245 245 243 245 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 248
Write 200
Mixed 105
SusWrite 244
146% 199 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.9
253% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 141%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40DB3-CWE 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.4% Very good
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 23.5
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 10.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 221%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 34" 3440 1440 DELD128 DELL S3422DWG
Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $596
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback