F-plus FLAPTOP i

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemF-plus FLAPTOP i  (all builds)
MotherboardF-Plus f+ FLAPTOP I-SERIES
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 30 '23 at 14:39
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1215U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 62
1-Core 157
2-Core 285
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 637
67% 535 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 13.2
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 14.4
11% 15 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 13.3
12% 15 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee XP1000F256G 256GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 966 1066 1109 1135 1088 357 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,576
Write 1,237
Mixed 1,167
SusWrite 954
276% 1,233 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 56.8
203% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 480
DQ Write 820
DQ Mixed 110
236% 470 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 213%
Great: 262%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Shenzhen Longsys Electronics Co Ltd FD4AS3200C8GZH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 17.3
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 HKC3D05
Typical FLAPTOP i Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: F-plus FLAPTOP i

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback