Acer Nitro AN515-46

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-46  (all builds)
MotherboardRB Jimny_RBH
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '23 at 23:14
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 70.5
1-Core 161
2-Core 296
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 824
86% 689 Pts
64-Core 920
57% 920 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Acer(1025 159E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.5% Good
Lighting 92.5
Reflection 79.6
Parallax 78.5
75% 83.5 fps
MRender 75.2
Gravity 64.6
Splatting 63.7
55% 67.8 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN810 SDCQNRY-512G-1014 512GB
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61470100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2110 1946 886 811 786 729 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 2,616
Write 1,777
Mixed 1790
SusWrite 1,211
412% 1,848 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 52.9
177% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 917
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 712
496% 637 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 260%
Great: 429%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
110% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 46.9
MC Mixed 36.9
117% 41.1 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 39.8
SC Mixed 25.9
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 110%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 144 15.5" 1536 864 AUOAF90
Typical Nitro AN515-46 Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Acer Nitro AN515-46

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback