Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics177% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemGigabyte H97-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '23 at 22:12
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 102
2-Core 165
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 432
49% 383 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
XFX(1EAE 6901) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
177% Outstanding
Lighting 203
Reflection 248
Parallax 524
165% 325 fps
MRender 399
Gravity 209
Splatting 327
255% 311 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 177%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 457
Write 304
Mixed 305
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 28.9
121% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 79.1
DQ Mixed 17.7
46% 101 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: D781
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 30.3
Write 45.1
Mixed 64.6
36% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.3
193% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M391B1G73QH0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.9% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 9 144 34" 1280 720 XMI3446 Mi Monitor
Typical GA-H97-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback