Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '23 at 18:41
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 214
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 572
59% 476 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Gainward(10B0 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 141
Parallax 130
104% 133 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 143
Splatting 120
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
639GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1133 1298 1409 1107 1474 942 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,563
Write 1,442
Mixed 1,222
SusWrite 1,227
307% 1,364 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 60.6
195% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 618
DQ Mixed 424
397% 621 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 230%
Great: 311%
Corsair Force LE 480GB-$240
447GB free
Firmware: SAFC12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 432 145 175 177 175 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 485
Write 426
Mixed 376
SusWrite 249
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 32.9
113% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 204
189% 289 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 100%
2.5" SATA SSD 3MG2-P 248GB
231GB free
Firmware: M150821
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 332 337 339 339 340 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 341
Mixed 302
SusWrite 333
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 39.5
135% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 189
171% 257 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 101%
Corsair Force LE 240GB-$85
222GB free
Firmware: SAFC12.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 202 179 180 179 178 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 356
Write 360
Mixed 306
SusWrite 214
70% 309 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 34.2
122% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 167
149% 224 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.16FARG 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
79% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 26.4
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 23
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 27 144 24" 1280 720 AUS24B1 ROG PG248Q
Typical GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,662 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 - $191

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $781
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback