Fujitsu FMVA0400L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu FMVA0400L  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB26D
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140619
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 29 '23 at 17:31
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 82
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 140
61% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 91.6
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 17AB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 5.1
1% 2.33 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.6
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Skihotar A320 256GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 333 284 326 270 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 449
Write 409
Mixed 348
SusWrite 273
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 10.3
94% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 12.4
67% 149 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.5% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 10.7
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 26 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD04A7
Typical FMVA0400L Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu FMVA0400L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $291
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback