Asrock Z790 Pro RS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive597% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock Z790 Pro RS  (all builds)
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '23 at 17:29
Run Duration465 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600K-$174
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 78
1-Core 200
2-Core 391
116% 223 Pts
4-Core 752
8-Core 1294
124% 1,023 Pts
64-Core 1834
114% 1834 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 109%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
EVGA(3842 3653) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 126
Parallax 125
113% 130 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 98
Splatting 94.5
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
721GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2308 4336 4319 4352 4266 4316 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
597% Outstanding
Read 4,136
Write 4,298
Mixed 2,833
SusWrite 3,983
859% 3,812 MB/s
4K Read 80.9
4K Write 263
4K Mixed 96.5
386% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 1,862
DQ Write 1333
DQ Mixed 1,632
1,210% 1,609 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 597%
Great: 623%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
227GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1048 730 766 629 462 434 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,964
Write 1888
Mixed 1,616
SusWrite 678
344% 1,537 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 63.1
259% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,798
DQ Write 1285
DQ Mixed 1,453
1,109% 1,512 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 267%
Great: 297%
35TTFP6PCIE-1TB 1TB
256GB free
Firmware: T0709A3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1403 1394 1430 1381 282 231 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,423
Write 1,328
Mixed 937
SusWrite 1,020
264% 1,177 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 23
140% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 794
DQ Write 1,046
DQ Mixed 506
498% 782 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 200%
Great: 254%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
174GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 860 105 105 140 104 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,458
Write 1,345
Mixed 1,006
SusWrite 237
226% 1,011 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 67.2
262% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 635
DQ Write 884
DQ Mixed 460
432% 660 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 187%
Great: 255%
Tcsunbow X3 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 342 301 300 299 299 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 451
Mixed 427
SusWrite 325
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 51.1
164% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 132
158% 276 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 106%
Great: 116%
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 406 381 355 416 414 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 412
Mixed 327
SusWrite 395
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 48.2
168% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 240
197% 285 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 109%
Great: 119%
Adata SX8100NP 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: VB411D39
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1194 1248 1249 1252 1253 1260 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 2,437
Write 1,085
Mixed 1,110
SusWrite 1,243
326% 1,469 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 82.7
272% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,243
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 1,223
849% 1,069 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 302%
Great: 336%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
567GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 42 44 26 43 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
546GB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 127 125 126 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 124
Write 121
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 126
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 183 198 198 185 177 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 97%
HGST HTS 541075A9E680 750GB
698GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 55.3
Write 31
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 39
50% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
44% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX5M2B5600C36 CMH32GX5M2B5200C40 CMK32GX5M2B5600C36 CMH32GX5M2B5200C40 64GB
4800, 4800, 4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
171% Outstanding
MC Read 68.3
MC Write 69.3
MC Mixed 64.7
193% 67.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 50.3
SC Mixed 30.8
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical Z790 Pro RS Builds (Compare 982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z790 Pro RS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,208
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback