Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 149%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive455% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '23 at 10:34
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 191
2-Core 377
118% 222 Pts
4-Core 734
8-Core 1,146
116% 940 Pts
64-Core 1,718
106% 1,718 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6750-XT
Asus(1043 05E7) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.8.1
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 146
Parallax 306
119% 199 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 159
Splatting 216
172% 210 fps
Poor: 124%
This bench: 130%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4468 3305 3012 1811 1514 1545 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
455% Outstanding
Read 2,744
Write 4,586
Mixed 3279
SusWrite 2,609
750% 3,305 MB/s
4K Read 71.4
4K Write 248
4K Mixed 109
380% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 1,768
DQ Write 1,326
DQ Mixed 1,570
1,167% 1,555 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 455%
Great: 614%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87
133GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,879
Write 3,147
Mixed 2,846
662% 2,958 MB/s
4K Read 72
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 95
313% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,661
DQ Write 1,336
DQ Mixed 1,491
1,118% 1,496 MB/s
Poor: 206% Great: 442%
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4653 4734 4722 4723 4721 4938 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
566% Outstanding
Read 2,325
Write 3,904
Mixed 3,298
SusWrite 4,748
814% 3569 MB/s
4K Read 63.2
4K Write 248
4K Mixed 110
367% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,764
DQ Write 1,320
DQ Mixed 1,634
1,197% 1,573 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 566%
Great: 614%
Spcc Solid State Disk 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: HPS2704M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 451 450 453 450 449 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 81%
SPCC Sol id State Disk 1TB
380GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 375 373 370 368 372 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 357
Write 388
Mixed 337
SusWrite 374
501% 364 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 19.3
1,704% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 30
DQ Mixed 15.3
1,600% 20.4 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 226%
Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6400J3239G322x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
208% Outstanding
MC Read 81.2
MC Write 70.1
MC Mixed 75.5
216% 75.6 GB/s
SC Read 65.7
SC Write 72.9
SC Mixed 59.4
189% 66 GB/s
Latency 49.5
81% 49.5 ns
Poor: 150%
This bench: 208%
Great: 218%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 240 27" 1280 720 SAM105C LC27G7xT
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS Builds (Compare 112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $2,173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback