HP EliteBook 865 16 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive336% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 865 16 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8990
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime10.5 Days
Run DateAug 29 '23 at 03:18
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 56.5
1-Core 143
2-Core 280
83% 160 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 812
80% 654 Pts
64-Core 1,052
65% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8990) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.26.08
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.2% Poor
Lighting 34
Reflection 48.1
Parallax 41.1
28% 41.1 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 49
32% 37.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN810 SDCPNRY-512G-1006 512GB
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1639 1986 2219 2405 2424 2018 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 2,316
Write 2,163
Mixed 1,853
SusWrite 2,115
476% 2,112 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 69.1
239% 86.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,350
DQ Write 453
DQ Mixed 1,064
743% 956 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 336%
Great: 434%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 32.5
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 13.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 16" 1536 960 AUO9F99
Typical EliteBook 865 16 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: HP EliteBook 865 16 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback