Fujitsu ESPRIMO D556/2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO D556/2  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3430-U1
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '23 at 22:11
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User MNE-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 222
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 410
49% 378 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 4026) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.2% Average
Lighting 51.6
Reflection 78.7
Parallax 50.6
42% 60.3 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 48.2
Splatting 45
42% 53.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 469
Write 400
Mixed 407
95% 425 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 23.6
100% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 0.4
71% 170 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
63GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 219 222 222 226 212 MB/s
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.5% Good
Read 265
Write 131
Mixed 210
SusWrite 216
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 24.1
91% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 122
118% 187 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 04CD F4-3000C16-8GISB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.1% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 21.4
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 20.6
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 21.5" 1280 720 FUS0899 E22-8 TS Pro
Typical ESPRIMO D556/2 Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO D556/2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback