Lenovo 82QE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82QE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230306
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateAug 28 '23 at 20:38
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1240P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 46.4
1-Core 153
2-Core 281
82% 160 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 782
82% 655 Pts
64-Core 1,080
67% 1,080 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3AE4) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4669
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 14.2
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 17.1
12% 16.7 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 13.5
13% 16.7 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 512GB
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L1QHXC7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,238
Write 1536
Mixed 1,088
288% 1,287 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 61.5
209% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 789
DQ Write 443
DQ Mixed 716
506% 649 MB/s
Poor: 104% Great: 320%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNBK3MLYR-N6E 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.1% Outstanding
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 33.5
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 16.2
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 3 126 59 60 14" 1440 900 LEN8A98
Typical 82QE Builds (Compare 334 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82QE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback