Viglen VIG644M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemViglen VIG644M  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI H61M-P31/W8 (MS-7788)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '23 at 20:18
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 132
65% 103 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 281
36% 274 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.8% Poor
Lighting 35.8
Reflection 48.4
Parallax 39.1
29% 41.1 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 27.9
28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NS10LT 120GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.30.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 66 74 75 54 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.9% Below average
Read 256
Write 75.2
Mixed 101
SusWrite 59.9
27% 123 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 12.6
79% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 24.2
DQ Mixed 15.2
25% 50.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
9GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 85 108 85 77 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 88.2
Write 86.9
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 82.9
60% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.7% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.2
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1920 1080 GSM59A6 22EA53
Typical VIG644M Builds (Compare 665 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Viglen VIG644M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $480
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback