TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock B660M Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 260%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 240%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics264% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive313% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B660M Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230609
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 28 '23 at 19:36
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 165
2-Core 329
105% 195 Pts
4-Core 600
8-Core 962
96% 781 Pts
64-Core 1,160
72% 1,160 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑
This bench: 102%
 Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
ASRock(1849 5305) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.8.1
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
264% Outstanding
Lighting 367
Reflection 420
Parallax 794
299% 527 fps
MRender 503
Gravity 258
Splatting 391
313% 384 fps
Poor: 216% ↑
This bench: 264%
 Great: 293%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-create TM8FPH001T 1TB
535GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM15.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1495 1938 2886 2934 706 702 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 1,085
Write 1,968
Mixed 2,077
SusWrite 1,777
394% 1,727 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 266
4K Mixed 83.7
319% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,844
DQ Write 999
DQ Mixed 1,543
1,115% 1,462 MB/s
Poor: 226% ↑
This bench: 313%
 Great: 499%
Solidigm SSDPFKNU020TZ 2TB
452GB free
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2796 336 90 82 56 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 2,030
Write 2,668
Mixed 1,688
SusWrite 569
391% 1,738 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 262
4K Mixed 87.3
336% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 1,269
DQ Write 1,885
DQ Mixed 988
912% 1,381 MB/s
Poor: 187% ↑
This bench: 289%
 Great: 452%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 37
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 43.3
SC Mixed 32.1
95% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 109%
 Great: 115%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 27" 1280 720 ASRACA1 PG27Q15R2A
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical B660M Steel Legend Builds (Compare 473 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B660M Steel Legend

CPU
Core i5-12400FIntel  $120Bench 98%, 48,886 samples139x
Core i5-12400Intel  $130Bench 98%, 17,352 samples57x
Core i5-12600KIntel  $170Bench 109%, 101,563 samples52x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples85x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples61x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples29x
SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples18x
Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWDBench 242%, 51,051 samples17x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples16x
RAM
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 94%, 22,102 samples20x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples16x
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GBTeamBench 98%, 3,950 samples15x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $476
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback