Lenovo 81NH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemLenovo 81NH  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '23 at 14:12
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 48.5
1-Core 53
2-Core 77.1
37% 59.5 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 228
23% 187 Pts
64-Core 257
16% 257 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.40.48
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.57% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 4.8
2% 4.07 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.57%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L2 256GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0L1QEXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,806
Write 1,461
Mixed 1,016
316% 1,428 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 29.2
98% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 303
210% 268 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 241%
NE-512 512GB
358GB free
Firmware: S0312C0G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 625 663 666 674 608 694 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 608
Write 68
Mixed 114
SusWrite 655
80% 361 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 17.7
92% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 452
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 316
245% 340 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 107%
Great: 264%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.9% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 11.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 0 14" 1280 720 LGD05EC
Typical 81NH Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81NH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback