| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 37.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Casper NIRVANA (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130530 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 28 '23 at 13:08 |
| Run Duration | 109 Seconds |
| Run User | BIH-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
41.1%
Average
|
44% 73.6 Pts
|
16% 121 Pts
|
7% 113 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Asus(1043 8469) 3GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 474.14
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
37.4%
Below average
|
41% 59.5 fps
|
31% 43 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 52 45 48 50 56 MB/s
|
31.4%
Below average
|
39% 52.7 MB/s
|
158% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
43.2%
Average
|
44% 15.3 GB/s
|
38% 13.2 GB/s
|
33% 122 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 71 | 59 | 75 | 19" | 1280 720 | DEL4001 DELL 1901FP |
Typical NIRVANA Builds (Compare 856 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Casper NIRVANA
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 94x |
| Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 85x |
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 77x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 172x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 70x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 64x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $98 |