Lenovo 43514Q9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 43514Q9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory27.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200828
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 28 '23 at 10:00
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 52.6
2-Core 105
49% 77.3 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 426
40% 330 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.9% Below average
Lighting 37.9
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 36.6
31% 38.4 fps
MRender 50.1
Gravity 36.6
Splatting 38.7
34% 41.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 86 88 90 88 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 114
Write 109
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 89.2
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 74%
WD 3200AAJ External 320GB
173GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 55.9
Write 24
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 25.9
38% 32 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.9
46% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0- 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.6% Good
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 21.8
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 7.7
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 24.1" 1280 720 NEC6720 LCD24WMCX
Typical 43514Q9 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 43514Q9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback