bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DH55HC
Memory5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110422
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateAug 28 '23 at 03:14
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3480
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 166
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 334
37% 292 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
CLim: 945 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Lighting 31.6
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 37.4
26% 33.2 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 28.2
Splatting 22.1
21% 26 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 256GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM76D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 38 48 45 44 49 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31% Below average
Read 220
Write 182
Mixed 155
SusWrite 48.9
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 18.5
58% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 18
DQ Write 30.4
DQ Mixed 22.5
18% 23.6 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 31%
Great: 82%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
802GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 38 48 44 43 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44% Average
Read 103
Write 86.1
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 49.8
56% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44%
Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 10.5TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 42 22 31 30 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 133
Write 82.1
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 26.9
60% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.1
111% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.8% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 6.4
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 47 60 21.5" 1920 1080 ACI22FD ASUS VS228
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback