HP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 203%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics211% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive351% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8592
Memory59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '23 at 23:34
Run Duration362 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$284
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 143
2-Core 285
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 987
94% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,270
79% 1,270 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
Asus(1043 886E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 5213 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 545.31
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Lighting 310
Reflection 285
Parallax 321
253% 305 fps
MRender 380
Gravity 231
Splatting 194
211% 269 fps
Poor: 143%
This bench: 211%
Great: 211%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2179 2215 2244 2242 2223 2223 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
351% Outstanding
Read 2,434
Write 2,310
Mixed 2234
SusWrite 2,221
518% 2,300 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 79.2
252% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 995
DQ Write 745
DQ Mixed 909
669% 883 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 351%
Great: 526%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$112
925GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 475 475 475 475 475 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 484
Mixed 451
SusWrite 474
108% 479 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 49.6
164% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 354
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 116%
Great: 128%
Predator GM3500 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: 42AAT8KA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1879 1888 1889 1891 1891 1893 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2503
Write 1,943
Mixed 1,443
SusWrite 1,888
436% 1,944 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 69.4
227% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 1,060
DQ Write 829
DQ Mixed 572
529% 820 MB/s
Poor: 166%
This bench: 328%
Great: 381%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2239 2244 2244 1932 1536 1525 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 2,523
Write 2,314
Mixed 1,911
SusWrite 1,953
489% 2,175 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 79
256% 87.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,057
DQ Write 960
DQ Mixed 994
750% 1,004 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 345%
Great: 431%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 208 213 202 208 205 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x268C] TIMETEC-U16G-3200 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 27.3
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 38.8
SC Mixed 28.1
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 42: 0P 3R 6G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
42% 19% 93 217 60 75 27" 1280 720 ACR06C9 VG270U
Typical EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF Builds (Compare 410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback