Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IU_FA506IU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IU_FA506IU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506IU
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '23 at 20:09
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 56.5
1-Core 44.5
2-Core 94.8
40% 65.3 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 356
31% 262 Pts
64-Core 605
38% 605 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 16CF) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32.09
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 89.7
Parallax 25.1
15% 44.5 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 18.2
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,415
Write 1267
Mixed 1,089
280% 1,257 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 28.5
95% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 463
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 382
272% 354 MB/s
Poor: 111% Great: 237%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-046.A00G 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
93.3% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 33
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 18.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 75 31.5" 1280 720 VSCE635 VX3276-QHD
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IU_FA506IU Builds (Compare 625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IU_FA506IU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback