Acer Veriton M4665G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Veriton M4665G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M4665G
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '23 at 18:34
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 234
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 388
55% 404 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.9% Very good
Lighting 88.7
Reflection 88.6
Parallax 81.7
72% 86.3 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 77
Splatting 70.2
68% 85.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
256gb NVMe SSD 256GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP005PI0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 775 315 316 319 258 286 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,231
Write 1156
Mixed 1,131
SusWrite 378
218% 974 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 63.4
212% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 893
DQ Write 663
DQ Mixed 767
576% 774 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 173%
Great: 206%
Asmt 2115 120GB
70GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 67 56 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 373
Write 324
Mixed 297
SusWrite 90.6
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 23
75% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 131
95% 123 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 66%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
877GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 184 184 185 183 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 177
Mixed 104
SusWrite 182
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 108%
Great: 109%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
394GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 155 156 156 154 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 148
Write 128
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 153
82% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
428GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 132 133 132 133 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 134
Write 133
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 131
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G26C16U4W.8FD 859B BL8G26C16U4W.8FD 859B BL8G26C16U4W.8FD 859B CT8G4DFS6266.M4FE 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 27.9
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 22.1
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1920 1080 ACR0744 KA272
Typical Veriton M4665G Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M4665G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback