Huananzhi Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 154%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics166% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemHuananzhi Default string  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-T8
Memory53.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200525
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 27 '23 at 14:36
Run Duration351 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 89.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 214
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 780
73% 605 Pts
64-Core 1,882
116% 1,882 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$500
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4850 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Lighting 248
Reflection 227
Parallax 223
202% 233 fps
MRender 256
Gravity 163
Splatting 135
145% 185 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 166%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$95
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,138
Write 2,030
Mixed 1,418
414% 1,862 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 63.9
209% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 558
DQ Write 467
DQ Mixed 527
391% 517 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Netac NVMe SSD 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: SN10380 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2068 839 285 280 207 212 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,407
Write 1887
Mixed 1,400
SusWrite 648
301% 1,336 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 42.3
167% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 606
DQ Write 383
DQ Mixed 181
220% 390 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 169%
Great: 520%
Samsung 850 120GB
97GB free
Firmware: MVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 0 0 239 190 158 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 454
Write 317
Mixed 389
SusWrite 98.8
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 39.7
122% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 342
244% 314 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 115%
OCZ Vertex 460A 240GB-$177
161GB free
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 427 465 426 465 426 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 411
Write 448
Mixed 335
SusWrite 445
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 28.3
94% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 281
227% 319 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
411GB free
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 89 85 85 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
50% Average
Read 87.2
Write 88.7
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 86.7
60% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50%
Great: 60%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
5GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 98.6
Write 90.9
Mixed 70.5
65% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
36GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 35 35 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
116GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 85 91 110 74 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 125
Write 108
Mixed 78
SusWrite 91.3
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 57.3
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 45.8
140% 48.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 19.4
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 123%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 144 34.1" 1280 720 GSM76FE LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical Default string Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Huananzhi Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback