Lenovo 20N4001TCA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20N4001TCA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20N4001TCA
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '23 at 01:16
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 71
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 91.7
47% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 229
24% 192 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Legend(17AA 2279) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
4.13% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 4.8
4% 4.67 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 7.1
5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GD9TNG-L5B0B 512GB
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80750C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 750 596 626 632 631 659 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,278
Write 1,136
Mixed 1,257
SusWrite 649
243% 1,080 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 50.7
167% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 457
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 405
297% 392 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 160%
Great: 225%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CTD Kingston 9905700-050.A00G 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.1% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 20.3
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN40BA
Typical 20N4001TCA Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20N4001TCA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback