HP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-wf0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 190%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics180% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive554% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-wf0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8BAC
Memory54.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '23 at 15:22
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 74.1
1-Core 193
2-Core 390
113% 219 Pts
4-Core 744
8-Core 1,291
123% 1,017 Pts
64-Core 2,326
144% 2,326 Pts
Poor: 106%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080 (Laptop)
HP(103C 8BAC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
180% Outstanding
Lighting 241
Reflection 284
Parallax 274
196% 266 fps
MRender 385
Gravity 220
Splatting 191
208% 265 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 180%
Great: 218%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3952 4141 4040 4517 4510 2547 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
554% Outstanding
Read 2,792
Write 4,598
Mixed 3,482
SusWrite 3,951
842% 3,706 MB/s
4K Read 92.1
4K Write 253
4K Mixed 136
447% 160 MB/s
DQ Read 1,502
DQ Write 1,286
DQ Mixed 1,412
1,053% 1,400 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 554%
Great: 592%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF548S38-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
149% Outstanding
MC Read 59.5
MC Write 58
MC Mixed 56.6
166% 58 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 46.2
SC Mixed 30.7
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 109%
This bench: 149%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 CMT2704 GP27-FUS
Typical OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-wf0xxx Builds (Compare 314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-wf0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback