Gigabyte GA-A520M H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics172% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520M H  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '23 at 14:48
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 83.2
1-Core 152
2-Core 263
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 863
89% 717 Pts
64-Core 981
61% 981 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Zotac(19DA 3612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
172% Outstanding
Lighting 247
Reflection 236
Parallax 267
201% 250 fps
MRender 295
Gravity 184
Splatting 159
167% 213 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 172%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,816
Write 1922
Mixed 1,758
410% 1,832 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 63.9
221% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,198
DQ Write 1,042
DQ Mixed 1,119
839% 1,120 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 300%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB
676GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 95 96 96 98 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 96.9
Write 95.5
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 94.5
58% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 36
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 28.3
SC Write 45.6
SC Mixed 33.3
102% 35.7 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 2R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 31% 13 201 53 75 27" 2560 1440 AOC2703 Q27B3MA
Typical GA-A520M H Builds (Compare 619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $409
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback