Asus UX410UAR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus UX410UAR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX410UAR
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190416
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 26 '23 at 07:14
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 150
55% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 388
41% 327 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 15A0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.36% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 7.5
6% 7.2 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 11.1
8% 9.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.36%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 135 127 125 120 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 368
Write 232
Mixed 347
SusWrite 155
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 22.3
75% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 337
251% 331 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 133%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 345 91 37 39 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
48% Average
Read 361
Write 343
Mixed 314
SusWrite 154
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 10.4
52% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 32
71% 141 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Kingston 9905624-007.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.3% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 18.6
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 17.6
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 13.9" 1536 864 BOE0718
Typical UX410UAR Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX410UAR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback