PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B09 |
Motherboard | MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) (all builds) |
Memory | 58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181114 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 25 '23 at 21:37 |
Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.5%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 976 1090 1339 1331 1414 1227 MB/s
|
244%
Outstanding
|
|||
61.4%
Good
|
||||
Seagate Expansion 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 20 20 18 22 MB/s
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair CMR32GX4M2C3000C15 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
|
129%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14% | 7% | 56 | 204 | 58 | 75 | 23.6" | 1536 864 | MSI1462 Optix G241VC |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples | 125x |
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples | 43x |
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples | 37x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 39x |
RTX 2080Nvidia $385Bench 124%, 316,424 samples | 19x |
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 15x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Good | Total price: $753 |