Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 298% UFO	Desktop 107% UFO	Workstation 333% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	297% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	113.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230223
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '23 at 15:27
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 79.4 1-Core 178 2-Core 346 106% 201 Pts	4-Core 687 8-Core 1,274 117% 981 Pts	64-Core 2,190 136% 2,190 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$720 22,998 User benchmarks, average bench 290% Gigabyte(1458 40BC) CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 545.37 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	297% Outstanding	Lighting 453 Reflection 412 Parallax 453 369% 439 fps	MRender 529 Gravity 357 Splatting 257 298% 381 fps
Poor: 263% ↑ This bench: 297% Great: 305%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4 10,188 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 851 536 525 548 534 402 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	243% Outstanding	Read 1,825 Write 1,003 Mixed 816 SusWrite 566 233% 1,053 MB/s	4K Read 61.2 4K Write 158 4K Mixed 85 286% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 1,318 DQ Write 782 DQ Mixed 676 604% 925 MB/s
Poor: 148% ↑ This bench: 243% Great: 293%
Galax TA1C0120A 120GB 185 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 112GB free Firmware: SAFM22.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 386 410 421 430 425 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	77.9% Very good	Read 457 Write 418 Mixed 312 SusWrite 407 90% 399 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 37.9 4K Mixed 23.7 81% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 145 128% 192 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 103%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$178 31,076 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 1.5TB free Firmware: SVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 405 431 443 456 450 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	97% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 446 Mixed 402 SusWrite 429 100% 445 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 73.1 4K Mixed 36.9 132% 46.8 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 221 166% 224 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 136%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 31GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 308 308 311 311 249 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 431 Mixed 395 SusWrite 310 90% 401 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 88.1 4K Mixed 52.1 175% 60.3 MB/s	DQ Read 251 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 220 166% 223 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 124%
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB 6,356 User benchmarks, average bench 463% 902GB free Firmware: EIFK31.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3393 3134 1788 1702 1589 166 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	377% Outstanding	Read 2207 Write 4,016 Mixed 3,115 SusWrite 1962 642% 2,825 MB/s	4K Read 69.3 4K Write 223 4K Mixed 106 359% 133 MB/s	DQ Read 1,356 DQ Write 1,222 DQ Mixed 1,286 965% 1,288 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 377% Great: 614%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 716GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 77 77 78 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 46.9 Write 56.5 Mixed 43.4 SusWrite 77.8 41% 56.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMH128GX4M4E3200C16 4x31.8GB 231 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 44.1 MC Write 38.2 MC Mixed 37.4 114% 39.9 GB/s	SC Read 29.3 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 39 88% 30.7 GB/s	Latency 81.8 49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 156%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	58	60	48.9"	1280 720	SAM0E5E C49HG9x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,832 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $144Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	872x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	833x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	570x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	515x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	403x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	340x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	271x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $937

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16