Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	38.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H310M A 2.0
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF (all builds)
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '23 at 13:52
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Memory 92.1 1-Core 123 2-Core 244 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 692 74% 588 Pts	64-Core 689 43% 689 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Nvidia(10DE 2188) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	38.2% Below average	Lighting 54 Reflection 55.3 Parallax 53.4 44% 54.2 fps	MRender 63.5 Gravity 49.7 Splatting 0.2 27% 37.8 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
HP S700 250GB-$32 9,815 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 38 24 72 23 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Read 444 Write 354 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 87.6 49% 224 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 6.9 4K Mixed 0.6 27% 7.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 931GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 194 190 194 193 196 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 198 Write 153 Mixed 80.9 SusWrite 193 114% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905702-022.A00G 1x8GB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	47% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 12.6 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 14.2 42% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	27"	1280 720	PHLC156 PHL 273V7

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M A 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 62%

Destroyer

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 52%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	201x
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	80x
Core i7-9700FIntel $279Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	43x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	41x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	32x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
SSD 240GBGigabyte $32Bench 73%, 20,238 samples	12x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 81%, 16,423 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $361

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16